Thursday, July 30, 2009
GSEs Unlikely to Repay U.S. in Full
Please refer to my post on July 10, 2009.
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Recent CDS Auctions:
Lear Corporation CDS: 38.5 cents on the dollar
Six Flags, Inc. CDS: 14 cents on the dollar
Visteon Corporation CDS: 3 cents on the dollar
General Motors Corporation CDS: 12.5 cents on the dollar
I guess there is risk in lending to corporate America............
Monday, July 27, 2009
Surging Profit Estimates Signal 26% Rally for S&P 500
In the above linked article, the authors state that "Wall Street firms estimate the S&P 500 will earn $74.55 a share next year." They neglect to mention that this is on an OPERATING basis. It does not include items that are not perceived to be parts of everyday business, e.g. write-offs.
In my posts regarding equity valuation, I have been relying on S&P's own estimate of AS REPORTED earnings. My reasoning is that these write-offs have been so pervasive and consequential, that ignoring them would vastly overstate future earnings potential.
For calendar 2010, S&P estimates operating earnings of $74.01, not too far from the Street consensus. However, their as reported number comes in at $37.26. That is basically one-half of operating earnings. The below graph tracks the ratio of the reporting methods. You be the judge. (Note: my analysis consistently tracks historical as reported numbers, I NEVER combine apples & oranges.)
New home sales surpassed estimates: 384,000 vs. 352,000
However, please take note:
- This represents a 21.3% fall from June, 2008
- The median price has fallen 12% from June, 2008 and 5.8% from May, 2009
- Inventory stands at 8.8 months. This is a marked improvement from the last few months, but still exceeds the 20 year average of 5.8 months
Sunday, July 26, 2009
Release Period Prior Median
Indicator Date Value Forecast
New Home Sales ,000’s 7/27 June 342 352
New Home Sales MOM% 7/27 June 2.7% 2.9%
Case Shiller Monthly YO 7/28 May -18.1% -17.9%
Case Shiller Monthly In 7/28 May 139.2 138.6
Consumer Conf Index 7/28 July 49.3 49.0
Durables Orders MOM% 7/29 June 1.8% -0.6%
Durables Ex-Trans MOM% 7/29 June 1.1% 0.0%
Initial Claims ,000’s 7/30 18-Jul 554 580
Cont. Claims ,000’s 7/30 11-Jul 6225 6300
GDP Annual QOQ% 7/31 1Q A -5.5% -1.5%
Personal Consump. QOQ% 7/31 1Q A 1.4% -0.5%
GDP Prices QOQ% 7/31 1Q A 2.8% 1.0%
Core PCE Prices QOQ% 7/31 1Q A 1.6% 2.4%
Employ Costs QOQ% 7/31 2Q 0.3% 0.3%
Chicago PM Index 7/31 July 39.9 43.0
NAPM Milwaukee Index 7/31 July 50.0 52.0
Saturday, July 25, 2009
- 64 banks have failed in 2009
- Insurance fund balance on 3/31/09: $13 billion
- Cost of failures since 3/31/09: $11.26 billion
- Special assessment income (one time): $5.7 billion
- Additional income (my estimate): $1.2 billion
- Current balance: $8.64 billion
It is a certainty that the FDIC will run out of funds and tap their credit line with the Treasury Department. This will necessitate the issuance of more Treasury debt and increase the burned n the taxpayer.
Friday, July 24, 2009
The U.K.'s GDP number for the second quarter surprised to the downside: 0.8% decline. Some forecasters were actually predicting an expansion. Remember, this number is not annualized: our BEA would have reported this number as a drop of 3.2% (please see the post on June 30, 2008 regarding calculation methods).
Thursday, July 23, 2009
June existing home sales slightly bested expectations. The above graph tracks the median sales price versus the amount of existing home inventory since January, 2008. I am less impressed by the month over month improvement than I am by the year over year performance. June's combination of seasonal factors, pricing and mortgage rates was enough to lure the most buyers into the market in over 12 months (and mortgage rates hit their highs in June)*.
*based on actual number of sales recorded for that month (not annualized)
Initial jobless claims came in an 554,000: just around the consensus estimate. Back on July 9, I mentioned that seasonal adjustment factors would distort this number for a few weeks. Starting with next weeks report, the number will jump dramatically higher. In fact, if next week's factor was applied to this week's report, the number would have been 669,000 !!!!!
The same can be said for the continuing claims number, although to a lesser extent. I have also noted in past posts that this number becomes tougher to interpret because we don't know why this number is falling; new jobs or expiration of benefits?
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE DATA FOR REGULAR STATE PROGRAMS
Initial Claims (SA)
Initial Claims (NSA)
4-Wk Moving Average (SA)
Ins. Unemployment (SA)
Ins. Unemployment (NSA)
4-Wk Moving Average (SA)
Ins. Unemployment Rate (SA)2
Ins. Unemployment Rate (NSA)2
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Having now entered the 2nd quarter earnings season (37 of the S&P 500 companies have reported so far), it seems like the right time to review valuations:
S & P 500 closed at 954.58 yesterday
My fair value opinion: 726.97
The index needs to drop 23.84% to compel me to buy.
At 726.97, the earnings yield would equal the long term average of 4.795%
The earnings yield at current levels is 3.652%.
The earnings yield calculations are based on 2010 numbers: using S & P's forecasts, I arrived at a figure of $34.86.
Sunday, July 12, 2009
|Date||Time (ET)||Statistic||For||Actual||Briefing Forecast||Market Expects||Prior||Revised From|
|Jul 13||2:00 PM||Treasury Budget||Jun||-||NA||-$77.5B||$33.5B||-|
|Jul 14||8:30 AM||Core PPI||Jun||-||NA||0.1%||-0.1%||-|
|Jul 14||8:30 AM||PPI||Jun||-||NA||0.8%||0.2%||-|
|Jul 14||8:30 AM||Retail Sales||Jun||-||NA||0.5%||0.5%||-|
|Jul 14||8:30 AM||Retail Sales ex-auto||Jun||-||NA||0.5%||0.5%||-|
|Jul 14||10:00 AM||Business Inventories||May||-||NA||-1.0%||-1.1%||-|
|Jul 15||8:30 AM||Core CPI||Jun||-||NA||0.1%||0.1%||-|
|Jul 15||8:30 AM||CPI||Jun||-||NA||0.6%||0.1%||-|
|Jul 15||8:30 AM||Empire Manufacturing||Jul||-||NA||-5.00||-9.41||-|
|Jul 15||9:15 AM||Capacity Utilization||Jun||-||NA||67.9%||68.3%||-|
|Jul 15||9:15 AM||Industrial Production||Jun||-||NA||-0.6%||-1.1%||-|
|Jul 15||10:00 AM||Business Inventories||May||-||NA||NA||NA||-|
|Jul 15||10:30 AM||Crude Inventories||07/10||-||NA||NA||-2.90M||-|
|Jul 15||2:00 PM||Minutes of FOMC Meeting||June 24||-||-||-||-||-|
|Jul 16||8:30 AM||Initial Claims||07/11||-||NA||NA||565K||-|
|Jul 16||9:00 AM||Net Long-Term TIC Flows||May||-||NA||NA||$11.2B||-|
|Jul 16||10:00 AM||Philadelphia Fed||Jul||-||NA||-5.0||-2.2||-|
|Jul 17||8:30 AM||Building Permits||Jun||-||NA||523K||518K||-|
|Jul 17||8:30 AM||Housing Starts||Jun||-||NA||530K||532K||-|
Friday, July 10, 2009
Please click the above graphs to expand. Theses graphs track the cumulative annual earnings for each company (1999, 1999 + 2000, 1999 + 2000 + 2001, etc.). For example, Freddie Mac's net income from 1999 - 2007 was $28.28 billion. Keep this in mind when evaluating the following (I used the most conservative measure of government investment, so use your imagination if you want to see how much worse it can get.):
Current Market Capitalization: $360 million
Government Investment: $50.7 billion
2009 Q1 Earnings: -$10.2 billion
Current Market Capitalization: $570 million
Government Investment: $34.2 billion
2009 Q1 Earnings: -$23.2 billion
Current Market Capitalization: $1.3 billion
Government Investment: $69.8 billion
2009 Q1 Earnings: -$5.4 billion
Current Market Capitalization: $702 million
Government Investment: $50.7 billion
2009 Q1 Earnings: -$6 billion
Quite simply, how are these companies going to generate the earnings to pay the taxpayer back? Why would the government invest so much money when the stock market is placing a dramatically lower valuation on these companies? Question for the ages.....
Thursday, July 9, 2009
Initial jobless claims fell below 600,000 for the first time since late January. This came in lower than most estimates. Continuing claims resumed their upward climb, eclipsing 6.8 million in this week's report.
It is worth noting that the seasonal factors for the next 2 weeks (this week's report as well) are considerably different from the last few weeks. In fact, if the same factor from last week as used in this week's report, the initial claims figure would have been 637,000!
This is one of the major reasons why one week's worth of data is of nominal importance.
The below link will bring you to the whole report:
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
- Carloads dropped 19.7% from June '08 - June '09
- Intermodal traffic (flatcars) dropped 18.2% from June '08 - June '09
- 1st half of 2009 traffic down 19.5% and 17.0% respectively
- Largest percentage declines experienced by motor vehicles & equipment and metals & metal products
- Canadian traffic suffered comparable declines
On a related note:
Greenbrier Reports Fiscal 3rd Quarter Loss
Monday, July 6, 2009
The Fog of War: Eleven Lessons from the Life of Robert S. McNamara
Personally, I accept his remorse as earnest. It is a film all should watch, especially in light of today's political atmosphere.
Friday, July 3, 2009
Seven banks were shuttered yesterday, six of which were domiciled in Illinois. All of the banks were small, Founders Bank was the largest at just under $1 billion in assets. According to a Bloomberg news story, all six Illinois banks were controlled by the same family.
Poor decision making was not reserved to the money center banks or the greed of new banks. The FDIC will be busy for another year.
Thursday, July 2, 2009
"The deposit rate is at the same time cut to -0.25 per cent and the lending rate to 0.75 per cent. "
The deposit rate is the "overnight rate of interest paid by the Riksbank on money held in accounts with banks."
So the central bank of Sweden is charging banks money to accept deposits. This is simply astounding. That is what I call deflationary fear.
Initial claims came in on the screws: 614,000 vs. estimate of 615,000.
Continuing claims came in a bit lower than forecast. This number is showing signs of having hit a peak 3 weeks ago. However, as I have mentioned in previous posts, it is important to know why the number is falling. If it is falling because people are finding jobs, great. If it is falling because people's benefits are expiring, not so good. Thirty-four states (and D.C. & P.R. as well) are offering extended benefits to those still looking for jobs. Those hopeful citizens are not included in this tally. I am trying to quantify.
Non-farm payrolls fell by 467,000 in June. This was considerably more than the consensus estimate of a loss of 350,000 jobs. However, it was only 17,000 more than my estimate of 450,000 (!). Revisions to the previous months were mixed & minor.
- 18 consecutive months of job losses
- 6,340,000 job losses since & including 12/2007
- Employment now stands at the same level as 9/2004
Wednesday, July 1, 2009
Job losses exceeded estimates: 473,000 vs. expectations of 390,000.
The miss was mitigated by upward revisions to previous months.
- 17 consecutive months of job losses
- 6,206,000 job losses since & including 12/2007
- Employment now stands at the same level as 4/2004